Open Data and the Case for a Ni-Ni-Ni 6D

Even today, a plurality of Venezuelans identifies neither as chavistas, nor as maduristas, nor as opposition supporters. They hold the keys to the kingdom.

8
Llorens and Ron

Last Friday, in Lugar Común bookstore, Altamira, was a chance to ponder on what will happen a week from now, on 6D National Assembly Elections. But it wasn’t about Datanalisis or Hinterlaces predictions, we have enough of those in the newspapers and the internet. The speakers – psychologists Manuel Llorens and Miguel Ron – presented Encuestas Libres, their their open data research project on public opinion, with their own estimations for the elections to come.

Llorens and Ron agree that opposition candidates will win the national popular vote. How large the margin will be depends on how many non-chavista-non-opposition voters will turn out next Sunday.  

Normally, public opinion surveys are conducted by private enterprises whose business relies on providing information to paying customers. Sometimes, their partial results are featured on newspapers or websites, but most of their analyses are not meant to be shared with the general public. This group decided to undertake an alternative path, promoting public discussion through open access. The resulting product is encuestaslibres.org.

The main difference between this initiative and traditional political opinion data is their approach: they want to learn something about people’s political identity and opinions from their own points of view. So in addition to two rounds of traditional public opinion polls (national sample of 1000 subjects) they also conducted in-depth interviews following political opinion changes during a period of two years for the same sample.

Innovative, to say the least.

The orange chairs set up inside Lugar Común weren’t enough for the crowd that showed up that evening. You could make out the standing room only crowd from the shop windows on the street. They were all looking at the coffee bar, transformed into a podium where the speakers were talking about their research results. Behind them was an Italian coffee maker and above it, white shelves held anything from white cups with their plates to piles of books. On the top shelf, a video monitor showed the statistical data to the public.

First of all, they showed how the people in the sample who identify themselves and the majority as non-opposition, non-chavista, non madurista (they call them “ni-ni-ni”): 39%. People identified with opposition or chavismo are almost equal, 29% the former and 28% the latter.

They also asked about their past political affiliation and found that most of the chavistas were adecos before and most of the ni-ni-ni were chavistas before. The issue here is how to explain why disillusioned chavistas changed into ni-ni-ni’s or into opposition. When people were asked about their motives, disappointed chavistas became ni-ni-ni because of our difficult economic situation, specifically, food shortages. But once they became aware of existing corruption among  their political leaders, they were more likely to identify as opposition.-  So hey, MUD: why isn’t corruption a big campaign issue??

autodefinición política

Those with a political identification with one of the poles of our polarized election, are the most likely to vote on 6D, more than 80% of chavistas and opposition say they will. But people identified as ni-ni-ni are less determined to vote, and their vote intention diminished between August and November. The majority of this group would vote for opposition candidates because of the economic situation, but government strategy to promote fear and demobilization appears to be successful so far.

Finally, the result scenarios for 6D: they designed 2 hypothetic possible results, depending on turnout level. In both scenarios opposition will win in national vote: the gap will be more than 30% in case of high turnout, but could diminish to a difference of 10% if ni-ni-ni turnout is low.

escenarios6D

An interesting additional finding was how chavismo and opposition leaders are perceived by Venezuelans, which personal characteristics are attributed to them and what people think is needed to be a good president. Nicolás Maduro and Diosdado Cabello are both very badly evaluated in all measures. Interestingly, people apparently don’t see clear differences between Henrique Capriles and Leopoldo López. We all were amazed watching how people still have such a positive image of Hugo Chavez, so dissonant with what he actually did as a political leader. But understanding people’s views is urgent in order to achieve political changes in Venezuela.

atributos personalidad

No one left, despite the two hours talk, the multiple questions made by the public, and the not so optimistic results. The talk lasted until Lugar Común closing time and there was a toast for Encuestas Libres launching. Until now, this research has been supported by the team working on it, but now they have started to publish their results (you can read them in their website) and they intend to begin a crowdfunding campaign to make this effort sustainable. Information is power, and I think this open access initiatives are central for democracies in the 21st century. For me this is another evidence of how Venezuelan society is moving, innovating and shaping its future; one more reason to be hopeful.

 

Previous articleHouston, we have a Panel!
Next articleThe Simple Majority Con
Is a PhD sociologist and researcher at Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales and Sociology Professor at Escuela de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Católica Andrés Bello. Blogger and collaborator of SIC Semanal and ElUcabista.com.

8 COMMENTS

  1. Fascinante y original metodologia la que se resena , tambien notable el esfuerzo por perfilar la personalidad percibida de cada lider . Los resultados de esta ultima me asombran , hay definitivamente un problema del Venezolano comun en percibir la realidad tras las fachadas que ellos o sus rivales construyen !!

    Algunas cosas me confunden , por ejemplo por que los ni ni ni ni se segregan de los ‘otros independiente’?, sospecho que las dos categorias pueden solapar. Lo otro por que no se resalta que parte de los que se declaran chavistas pero no maduristas en el fondo son en lo funcional opositores del regimen.?? Un Chavismo descontento y una oposicion pueden confundirse en las urnas electorales (por lo menos en parte) .

    Aristoteles senalaba que tan importante como el grado de aceptacion de un regimen era el grado e intensidad del repudio o animosidad que inspiraba., o sea que en muchas comunidades la gente se define menos por lo que favorecen y mas por lo que rechazan , o sea cuyas antipatias (siendo apasionadas) los definen mejor que sus simpatias ( que son animicamente moderadas) . Este a juzgar por el resultado de estas noveles encuestas pareciera ser el caso de Venezuela .

    • Los que se identifican como independientes deben ser los votantes de otras opciones que existen como “electores libres” (Sairam rivas & CIA) u otros partidos que no están en la MUD como NUVIPA.

  2. Interesting article, original research.

    ” The issue here is how to explain why disillusioned chavistas changed into ni-ni-ni’s or into opposition. When people were asked about their motives, disappointed chavistas became ni-ni-ni because of our difficult economic situation, specifically, food shortages. But once they became aware of existing corruption among their political leaders, they were more likely to identify as opposition.- So hey, MUD: why isn’t corruption a big campaign issue??”

    The MUD is not very smart, organized or professional. Or it could be that corruptible crooks don’t like to blow the whistle on one another before the party begins?

    It’s simply pathetic that almost 40% of the population is “ni-ni” . With all due disrespect, how dumb can they possibly be? Are they masochistic, or just waiting for a piece of the Oil pie to make up their minds? Or plain dumb and uneducated. After 16 years they are not sure that Chavismo is a deadly pest? They are not positive that Anything would be better than the status quo? They do not comprehend that, with all its flaws and weaknesses, there’s only one way out at this time, y despues vemos? Or they think global warming or Maria Lionza will take care of everything, so why vote?

    The levels of ignorance are just embarrassing when I remember that old Venezuelan passport. And that does not include the 30% or more Full Blown Chavistas, or the 10 Million or more who will vote for the PSUV. Now what can anyone conclude about all those people? say 65% of the nation who will not vote pro-change? It’s just incredible.

    The kindest adjectives that one could think to describe All those people include: Naive. Misinformed. Extraterrestrial : Aloof. Apathetic. Disenchanted. Skeptical. Bitter. Frustrated. But the real description is closer to: Corruptible, waiting in line to get rich, illegally, anyway the wind blows.. Unwilling to commit before the fat lady sings.. . That’s # 1. Unless they’re just highly unintelligent and/or with minimal education, pardon the verbiage. Too many Novelas? What planet do they live on? How hard can it be to understand that Venezuela is a disaster almost as bad as Syria, perhaps even worse than Haiti or Nigeria? That Any change is needed, before another family member gets killed for a cell phone or a car battery?

    If they had “2 dedos de frente” they would ALL vote against Chavismo. 25 Million, because small children can’t vote. If they were not highly Corrupt, Enchufados in the system, Leeches, or at least Corruptible, waiting in line like salivating hyenas for the “Gobielno” to do them a favor, they would vote without hesitation for the freaking MUD. What’s the alternative? Doing nothing means voting for more Chavismo, abstention means stupidity or corruption or both.

    • It’s hard to accept, but there is a lot of people that truly believe they would be in a worse situation if “escuálidos” should come back to power. The ones who were excluded, those who no one cared about. MUD’s hasn’t elaborated a proposal in which they can trust, in which they still feell important for national politics.
      This wall/barrier is symbolic and was cultivated and stregthened by Chavez for years. Our task is to diminish it, if we want to promote democratic changes in Venezuela.

Leave a Reply