As in the rest of the world, the media landscape in Venezuela has shifted in recent years with the rise of the internet. The “communicational hegemony,” though, has forced many journalists to find other options beside newsprint-starved newspapers and self-muzzled broadcasting stations; NGO Medianálisis just released this short documentary about digital outlets and how they’re coping with the changing atmosphere, trying to push beyond mere news coverage. There’s La Vida de Nos, that I covered already and, today, I want to introduce you to another.

Arepita is a subscription-only newsletter that comes early in the morning, from Monday to Friday, offering a condensed view of what’s happening in Venezuela. It’s been active for over a year and it’s already getting attention not only for the newsletter itself, but also for its content in social networks.

Dariela Sosa, Arepita’s director, told me that back when she lived in Washington D.C., she was subscribed to The Skimm, a newsletter summarizing the news, primarily marketed to women. After returning to Venezuela, she developed the Arepita idea on her own, gathering later a group of people who shared her same concerns and interests.

Two of them told me why they joined: Sociologist and co-author of “Caracas a pie”, Juancho Pinto, found a pleasant work atmosphere and an attractive business model. Alexis Correia, who previously wrote for Caracas-based newspaper El Nacional and other digital outlets, was convinced by Dariela’s leadership and the fact that Arepita was “a very different project compared to the rest” in local media.

Arepita is a subscription-only newsletter that comes early in the morning, from Monday to Friday, offering a condensed view of what’s happening in Venezuela.

Because Arepita is not just a quick digest of the relevant news in Venezuela, it’s both a curating effort of quality local news sources (which are getting harder to find), and a creative, amusing way to present current events and trends. The newsletter is a real team effort, with no individual credit given in the final product (following the model of The Economist).

How that little arepa is made? It ain’t easy.

A three-phase process follows: The first draft comes at 2 p.m., from Mr. Pinto. In his view, decisions are not only about choosing highlights of the day, but also “about building a narrative that’s accessible to the reader.” He also brings his sociologist perspective in. Most calls come down to him and journalist Clavel Rangel, Arepita’s newsroom chief.

The second draft comes around 7 p.m.; the night editor makes the necessary changes, focusing on the creative writing aspect. As Correia told me, “(Arepita) isn’t just a news service, it also takes care of the wording style.”

The third and final review comes at 5:30 a.m., before the bulletin is distributed to all subscribers.

This triple check system is quality-conscious and innovative work-wise, especially when the damaging effects of the “hegemony” and “fake news” collide.

Arepita’s newsletter format presents its content under a well-developed structure that resembles, well, an arepa: the main news (filling), context articles (dough), other diverse notes (the cream and butter) and the curious image, or story of the day (crust).

This triple check system is quality-conscious and innovative work-wise, especially when the damaging effects of the “hegemony” and “fake news” collide.

And speaking of arepas, you might have noticed how Arepita shares a connection with us regarding its logo, even if they take the arepa theme deeper. Dariela admits the choice isn’t quite original and it comes from the fact that there hasn’t been, in her view, a wide public discussion about the few Venezuelan symbols out there. They also included the budare, to better reflect “a country currently under construction.”

Another relevant Arepita aspect is its social media (you can’t miss their Twitter and Instagram accounts). According to Correia, in charge of this content, “It’s important to keep a good spirit regarding our current situation.” The combination of curiosities and attractive language and imagery wants to appeal especially to younger readers. “We want to use history, so we connect ourselves to who we were and who we are now,” adds Sosa.

They still face plenty of challenges, like many other Venezuelan digital media outlets: The hegemony continues to ramp up the pressure with online blockades and even arrests, and the crisis forces everyone to look for innovative ways to get funding (Arepita is free for subscribers, but sells advertising).

On his Journalists’ Day, I wanted to show another face of what independent Venezuelan media is doing, in the face of very tough circumstances. If last year was about the risks of covering the street protests, this year is about finding effective ways to inform a news-hungry citizenry, when mainstream media fails to do so.

Caracas Chronicles is 100% reader-supported. Support independent Venezuelan journalism by making a donation.


  1. Getting real news out is necessary. I hope the country isn’t reduced to picking up radio broadcasts from outside the country to try to find out what’s up.

    • Voice Of America. Meanwhile, should one stop paying CC (I personally am several years in debt) and go freebie Arepita?–I think not, fore we would sorely miss the comments of Canuck/Steemit/Serendipity/et. al. ….

  2. Lo que ha escrito parece un product placement más que un artículo de CC pero siempre está bien que se hable aquí de otros medios. En la arepita se echa de menos que no pongan enlaces a noticias en inglés. Los artículos de reuters, bloomberg… a veces cuentan bastante más que los medios venezolanos. Hoy por ejemplo hay un excelente video sobre Venezuela en el New York Times (impagable, nunca mejor dicho, lo de los niños jugando con dinero en la calle; cuando habla de las protestas y el hambre, va directo al grano). Aparecerá en la arepita de mañana?.

    A los que estamos en otras partes del mundo nos llega un poco tarde pero entiendo qué tipo de publicación es y no pretendo quejarme, tan solo recordar alguna de las limitaciones de ese tipo de formatos o maneras de presentar las noticias. Hablar sobre esto habría hecho que su artículo fuese más objetivo.

    En cualquier caso, les deseo a todos la mejor suerte.

    • Lol. This can’t be it:

      The Bloomberg story is 3 hours old, I believe. Interesting to see who covers it. The press … like the old saying goes, don’t pick a fight with people who buy ink by the barrel. Most people, including myself, do not know what’s going on. The big thing about China hacking tech from us … forty years ago other countries had access to our research labs in exchange for a few million in donations. TV sets are no longer made in the U.S. because those countries got fast-track production without having to wade through government regulations.

      • @ Gringo I have a feeling the story was probably manufactured by Maduro regime as a pretext to arrest some officers whose loyalty was in question and to discourage others from considering similar plots.

  3. “He also brings his sociologist perspective in.” Ay, there’s the rub.

    Establishment “journalists” are too deeply indoctrinated to overcome their bias. If you want real news, you need real journalists — which academia stopped producing about a century ago.

    • “The whole educational and professional training system is a very elaborate filter, which just weeds out people who are too independent, and who think for themselves, and who don’t know how to be submissive, and so on — because they’re dysfunctional to the institutions.”

      • I neglected to mention, Davey Jones, that’s a quote from Noam Chomsky. Apologist for 21st Century Socialism. I plucked it off the Google.

        I think when you make extreme and categorical claims about “establishment journalists”, academics, and who else?…scientists, judges?…you may begin to find yourself sounding like the thing you think you despise.

        Or to borrow Gustavo’s nice phrase, you find yourself where Hegemony and Fake News collide.

        • Let me say it a little more plainly for your benefit: leftist followers are so indoctrinated (not educated) that they can’t recognize their own bigotry. You completely disregard every view in opposition to yours because you know that they are wrong, because you were told so.

          • You don’t seem to appreciate that your little dig here at legitimate Venezuelan journalists is exactly the sort of language that the Maduro regime uses to delegitimize and to justify the persecution of these same journalists.

          • Q.E.D., thanks for proving my point about bigotry.
            You don’t seem to appreciate that establishment journalists are not legitimate, and you intentionally ignore that the direct statements above apply exclusively to establishment journalists like Pinto.

          • Davy Jones: Your comments are extraordinarily precise and, of course, deadly accurate. Not many, and apparently especially those north of the 49th parallel, are capable of taking an honest, unbiased examination the disreputable “profession” of journalism.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here