Remember the old days when Globovision was the last stand against the State’s total dominion of the Venezuelan airwaves? One of the most common images during those times were the frequent visits made by inspectors of the broadcasting authority (CONATEL) to inform the channel about the opening of an administrative investigation and how the channel turned these visits into a huge news event.

In May 2013, just before the station was sold to still un-identified regime-friendly investors, at least ten administrative procedures were open against the channel, with each one involving heavy financial fines and the threat of a full shutdown. Some consider that paying the huge fine regarding their coverage of El Rodeo prison riot in 2011 was the breaking point for the previous owners, given how they used the cryptic term “obligated intention to sell” to justify this operation.

Well, seems like the clock is turning back. During his live program on mid-Monday, journalist Vladimir Villegas informed that members of CONATEL were visiting the station. He used the opportunity to mention that Globovision’s broadcasting license has been expired since March of last year and that the blame for the lack of renewal fell completely with the regulator.

In a written statement published hours later, CONATEL dismissed Villegas’s opinions as “false and uninformed” and complained that Globovision is attempting to pressure the State regarding its status.

This impasse comes right after Nicolás Maduro threatened both Globovision and fellow channel Televen in the last few weeks. He considers that their coverage of the new National Assembly is quite similar to the events of April 2002. Villegas (who has become the main face of the news channel) has responded to Maduro’s claims on the air. A complete 180° of what were more kinder, “accomodating” times between both men.

Is the communicational hegemony starting to worry that Globovision is going rogue? There’s evidence that sustains those suspicions. And since the new National Assembly began work last month, people have been tuning in and it seems like Globovision is the big winner by giving extensive coverage to the parliamentary sessions. But this goes against the hegemony’s planned scenario of minimizing the AN’s role. So naturally, we have a conflict.

What is undeniable is that since the 6-D defeat and the re-opening of parliament to the press, we might be on the other side of “peak hegemony”.

Recently named Communication and Information Minister Luis José Marcano admitted last week on Twitter that “the country doesn’t need more media outlets, but more and better content”. Along with the recent cabinet reshuffle, some State media outlets have changed their heads.

None of which is to suggests the tight grip the State still has over the press will collapse any time soon: both censorship and self-censorship is the norm in many local newrooms while newspapers have the shadow of Newsprint-geddon over their heads.  

Even if the hegemony remains strong, there’s now showing a crack on its shell.

Caracas Chronicles is 100% reader-supported. Support independent Venezuelan journalism by making a donation.


    • Toro remember we are talking about Venezuela where the poverty rate is pretty high (no smart phones for everybody), telecom companies are shattered so data transmission and speed are almost an illusion and TV and radio stations which are the most effective way to keep the pueblo informed, are 99% estate owned. So really please do not say mass media is irrelevant…

  1. Gleichshaltung, the co-ordination of all messaging in accordance with the will of the Great Leader (or Great Party) is a core constituent part of the totalitarian project. It is true that internet communication makes it harder to achieve that goal, but it is far from irrelevant.

  2. Villegas, as far as I know, doesn’t own Globovision. He might be going rogue not only against the government, but against his bosses. It’s still too early to tell. Let’s see how long his newfound will to stand up against the government lasts. And if he lasts as face of Globovision as well.

  3. Partiendo del escenario donde Maduro sale del poder, sea por A o por Z, yo le dedicaría atención en ver como van a “jugar” los que quieren sobrevivir a la movida de mata.

    Si asumimos que el dueño incógnito de El Universal es el mismo de Globovision; y que el dueño de Últimas Noticias es el supuesto dueño de Televen, entonces el tira y encoge de estos dos bandos contra Maduro o a favor de el, es un buen indicativo de lo que se está moviendo tras bastidores.

    Sigo pensando que por parte de la oposición, tenemos que observar los movimientos del nuevo rock Star de Ramos Allup

  4. Its pure speculation. One would imagine that facing the obviously bleak state of your country the new management of Globovision loosened their editorial line and the remaining journalists have just started to do their job, following their own ethics.

    Btw. dolartoday has a problem with its graphic. Cúcuta rate is 4 digits now.

  5. El pelmazo ese del villeguitas hace unos años como director de pustv salió diciendo que el “balance en los medios no era traer al canal la misma cantidad de gente de ambos bandos, si no meter en el canal todo lo que ellos consideraban que no se veía en los demás”

    Excusa que patética es más falsa que un billete de madera porque el chavizmo es dueño absoluto del 98% de todos los medios de Venezuela, y para la época en que el carajo ese dijo eso el único canal de TV que no era rojo hasta la médula era GV, que hoy día no es más que otro apéndice de la hidra que es hegemoncorp.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here